Sunday, November 28, 2010

Anger Management - Jesus style


Where I live, it’s not uncommon to hear about murder on the news, pretty much every day. Someone’s always shooting or stabbing or otherwise committing the act, in one way or another. Somehow, someone will always find a way to murder someone else.  It’s a fact of life. Oh, and for all you gun-haters out there, if guns are taken away, knives, clubs, rocks, pillows, rope, fists…will be used in place of the guns. The fact is, people will always kill other people. Sometimes out of anger, sometimes by accident, sometimes out of revenge, sometimes by self-defense.

In church today, the Pastor talked about murder.  Sounds like an unlikely topic, doesn’t it?  Exodus 20:13 is the 6th commandment, “ Thou shall not commit murder”. The religious leaders of Jesus’ day interpreted this commandment literally, as had been done for quite a long time. In fact, ever since the commandments were handed down to Moses, by God Himself. However, Jesus wanted to teach them a new way to think about murder. He wanted them to think sort of ‘proactively’ about murder; to understand that murder begins in the heart through anger and unforgiveness. A simple concept, yet difficult for me to wrap my heard around. What Jesus was saying, is that to hold anger & unforgiveness in the heart is to commit the murder of someone’s character. Wow, that’s serious. Point taken.

Let’s talk about motive. What causes us to be angry an unforgiving? Is it because someone has wronged or offended us? Is it because of a certain situation? Are we angry at the situation and not the person? Being angry at something is not the same as being angry at someone. Hoping to not sound cliché here, but remember Jesus got pretty angry with the moneychangers, driving them out of the temple with a whip! He was angry with what they were doing, not with the people themselves.

How about revenge? Revenge is a nasty thing. It’s what the world wants us to seek, which should tell us that it’s bad, in and of itself.  We’re taught by our parents at an early age not to seek it. Yet every day, we’re tempted to dig it up from its grave, and stand on it, in some proud effort to find justice for the hurt or offense we’ve just experienced. In Romans 12, Paul tells us to ‘live peaceably with all men’.  And then he tells us to not seek revenge for ourselves, but to let God handle that. That’s an interesting concept in today’s world.

The board of Directors of GRC could easily seek revenge on blogger Pamela Geller and the former pastors of GRC. Geller posted a story on her blog stating the board members were being indicted for embezzlement, mail tampering, and wiretapping…..laughable at the least. No indictment has been handed out, and the accusations are completely false. Lorenz said Brian Smith, former Administrator of GRC, was a disgruntled former employee. That came after Smith, in a sworn statement, accused Lorenz of ignoring advice to contact the authorities of Rifqa Bary’s whereabouts. Lorenz said Smith was a liar, in spite of the fact that investigators have said they’ve found so many lies within Lorenz’s side of the story. Smith has voluntarily taken a polygraph, and was found to be telling the truth.

All of this could cause one to be angry at the people, and want to seek revenge on them.  Not so, with the GRC board, and Smith.  Angry at the situation they were put in? Yes, without a doubt! Angry at the people? No. Sad for them? Yes. Forgiven them? Yes.  Prayed for them? Yes, for a while. Revenge? Out of the question.

Matthew 5:21-22 says:

21 “You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder, and whoever murders will be in danger of the judgment.’ 22 But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment…


I’m still working on the ‘without a cause’ part. I’m not quite sure what that means. Seems to me there’s a cause to be angry. Understanding will come in time. 

Friday, November 26, 2010

Pot calling the kettle black

This was posted on Stemberger's facebook and a friend of mine sent to me...

August 20, 2010

AN OPEN LETTER TO JAMAL JIVANJEE REGARDING CHURCH DISCIPLINE FOR SLANDER, DISHONESTY AND FALSE ACCUSATIONS-- with Twelve Questions. 

Dear Jamal, it grieves me greatly to write this letter but you have left me no choice after attempting privately and Biblically to appeal to you on a number of occasions with no response.  God our Father has set forth a process to resolve conflicts and disagreements between Christian brothers or when someone believes that they have been sinned against.  This process is found in Matthew 18 and I Corinthians Chapters 5 & 6.  Please read and re-read these scriptures. 

You have sinned against me numerous times by making public statements that are both false and slanderous.  To attempt to resolve this conflict as the scriptures teach, I had a face to face meeting with you several months ago in my office.  This failed to resolve the issue I had with you, namely your insistence on publicly stating things that were not true and also failing to seek the facts out before speaking. After our meeting you again, continued to issue false and slanderous statements.

Then, I initiated a second meeting in my office and I brought along two other men as witnesses.  One of witnesses was Blake Lorenz, your pastor at the time, the other, the businessman who created the trust fund for Rifqa.  Instead of freely dialoging and engaging us with back and forth conversation, you said the only thing you were going to say at this meeting was to read out loud a long prepared formal statement.

After you read the statement, we each began to gently and carefully try to help you see several situations where you had publicly stated things that were simply not true.  You did not dispute the facts presented but merely stoically listened.  The three other parties in the room all clearly saw this pattern in your behavior and we all tried to kindly and patiently help you see the error, but you refused to recognize it or even show the slightest remorse.  I personally and passionately pleaded with you in this meeting that your facts, your spirit and motive were all wrong and begged you to not keep moving around from city to city, "prophetically" offending people with public declarations and then leave for yet another city with no real local accountability.

This meeting also failed to bring about reconciliation between us because you refused to repent and publicly recant your slanderous comments-- and then again started making similar false public statements in the weeks after that group meeting. 

I will acknowledge and thank you for the voice mail you left me in the weeks after that meeting where you admitted that (while you still fully stand by and would not correct any of your previous statements) you should have called me and with questions first before you went public.  You also committed to me in that call that you would not do that again.  While I appreciated that private call, the statement should have been made public since your slander and false statements against me were made in public.  At that point, because you showed some responsiveness, I was prepared to just let the matter go and overlook this offense and move on-- even though you refused to publicly apologize and make corrections about matters you knew were false.   

However, I was simply stunned, when a friend sent me your latest statement "Open Response to Rifqa Bary's Attorneys Video Interview" (which you did not even copy me on) with the rather unbelievable  accusation that all of Rifqa's lawyers-- but especially me-- are "corrupt" and engaging in "criminal" activity.  I contacted you, again in private, and asked you to please stop and publicly recant from the continued gossip, slander, false accusation and dishonesty toward me and the other lawyers and received no response.  On all these occasions where you have been approached, you have failed to respond by admitting what you said was wrong and publicly correcting yourself and or apologizing-- even when presented with written documentation showing your statements to be wrong. 

However, the seriousness and outrageous nature of your most recent public claims, coupled with the fact that you hold yourself out as a pastor, compels me to also respond-- and to do so publicly. 

My understanding of the next step in the Biblical process of reconciliation and or church discipline is to approach your pastor/s or the spiritual authority of your local church so this matter might be dealt within your church leadership.  However, it is my understanding from your writings that you do not believe in, nor submit yourself to any "institutional" church with a Biblical leadership structure of elders and or deacons. Therefore, I am compelled to submit this matter to the Christian community where you appear to have most of your activity and where you have sinned against me most regularly and egregiously.

Jamal, there are several questions that must be asked of you: 

1)   First, why have you failed to write and publicly rejoice and celebrate in the obvious-- namely that Rifqa Bary WON her case!!! and that an enormous historical victory against radical Islam and the enemy of our souls has been scored?

2)   Why have you not written to publicly thank and recognize Rifqa's legal team who have collectively freed her-- but instead you return again to slander the very people that Rifqa herself believes are the real heros?

3)   Why have you not admitted in hind sight that the legal strategy which you repeatedly and publicly criticized and denounced as wrong and foolish--- was in fact RIGHT because it worked and Rifqa is now free and well on her way to complete freedom in the US?

4)   Why is it that, even after Rifqa called you and gently asked you to stand down from criticizing her lawyers and told you that she supports them and the legal strategy, did you continue to criticize and slander her lawyers and did not abide by her requests?

5)   Why did you not tell your followers that Rifqa herself also eventually stopped communicating with you because of your public divisiveness and your refusal to honor her requests?

6)   Why did you not come to me privately and ask questions, and seek information and try to understand what was happening (something you admitted you should have done) before publicly spreading gossip, slander and your latest sensational and completely unfounded charge about "corrupt and criminal activity"?

7)   Why have you not written about the fact that you knew I received an unsolicited check in the mail for $5,000. for attorneys fees from the creator of the trust fund and that I SENT THIS CHECK BACK to the trust and the check was never cashed and that I (along with all the other lawyers on the team) were never paid a single penny for representing Rifqa?

8)   Why are you not telling people that you were freely given a complete copy of the accounting of the trust fund by me personally, in my office and that you could find no questionable or inappropriate expenses on it?

9)   Why are you brazenly accusing me and Rifqa's other lawyers of "corrupt" and "criminal" activity but have failed to clearly state what so-called "crime" has been committed and have never reported these so-called "crimes" to the police?

10)   Why did you in your previous writings, appear with great authority and certainty, attempt to interpret complicated state and federal statutes and render legal opinions misleading perhaps hundreds of people in the complex areas of immigration, criminal and dependency law and yet never had the first hour of legal training to qualify you to do so?

11)   Why did you publicly oppose Lou Engle, Tony Perkins, and other national Christian leaders in their attempt to help raise money for Rifqa's trust fund and will you now take responsibility for the fact that because of your opposition, Rifqa has very little money to make a transition with, live on, and most importantly pay for medical bills for follow up cancer treatments in the future? 

12)   Why did you leave Blake and Beverly Lorenz's church immediately after they announced from the pulpit that they fully supported Rifqa's legal team and the legal strategy and then turn on them also, leading other members of that church to leave so that you could then start your own church ministry? 

Your statement, an "Open Response to Rifqa Bary's Attorneys Video Interview" really did not address anything that attorney Kort Gatterdam said in the interview.  Instead, you used it as another opportunity to slander me and others with a new and simply outrageous accusation that I engaged in some vague and undefined "corrupt" and "criminal" behavior.   And what did I do to warrant a charge of this seriousness in your view?   First, I submitted my time sheet of the hours I spent as a lawyer on Rifqa's case to the man who created the trust fund after he requested it.  Second, you claim Rifqa was "pressured" by me to write a book.  I am not sure you understand what it takes to write a book but you cannot pressure anyone to do a task so intense and huge.  Further, ever since I first met Rifqa she has always told me SHE wanted to write a book!  When an author contacted us about helping her do that, those opportunities were presented to her which could have produced an income stream for her to live on and which would also help get her testimony and story out to the public.  Because of her focus on finishing school, she freely decided to not write a book at that time. Hardly corrupt-- and certainly not a crime.  Both of these things were fully explained to you in our second meeting in front of witnesses and you still hold onto your false narrative and repeat it again, leaving out the relevant facts you were told happened.

Jamal, you have misled perhaps thousands of people with bad information on Rifqa's case and personal slander against the very people who are directly responsible for saving our little sister's life.  Yet you refuse to apologize or correct the wrong statements made.  Instead, you continue to arrogantly write as if you have said or done nothing wrong and continue to try and find fault only with others—but never yourself.  You are holding on tight to a highly subjective interpretation of personal beliefs but will not stop long enough to humble yourself and consider that you just might have got it largely wrong in most of your written criticisms.  You have now become the center of all truth and no one (not even the facts) can convince you otherwise.  This is a dangerous place to live.  It is the kind of mentality that cults often form around. 

You started out with a significant place and an important role in the Rifqa Bary story as the first Christian she met who also converted from Islam.  Because of this role, we initially trusted you and included you in on some communications.  We directed media interviews to you.  We assumed you wanted to do what was in Rifqa's best interest and what she wanted.  Unfortunately, as time progressed, you became increasingly conspiratorial, divisive, proud and self-serving.  In the name of "doing the right thing" and "speaking the truth", you behaved foolishly by fighting and opposing the only people who were in a position to really help Rifqa, and in doing so you, betrayed us all-- including Rifqa-- over and over again.  Instead of speaking out against the Muslim lawyers and CAIR, who were fighting us brutally and unfairly at every turn, you only chose to oppose Rifqa's lawyers, most of whom were also brothers in the faith.  This is utter madness. 

One Christian leader who knows you and is aware of the situation has said:
"Jamal is what the Bible calls a scorner.  As opposed to a wise man, a scorner offers no wisdom, but attacks, accuses, and criticizes with no spiritual insight. Let us pray for his deliverance."  

I too will pray for your deliverance and I will for the final time implore you to repent and see the sinfulness of your ways and make restitution to me personally and others by publicly recanting and correcting your factually wrong and slanderous statements.  I do not wish to treat you, and encourage others locally and nationally to treat you, as an unbeliever and therefore outside the Church.

I believe that at heart Jamal, you are very well meaning, love Rifqa and attempt to seek after God wholeheartedly.  But I also believe you are deeply deceived, misguided, filled with pride and arrogance, and badly in need of coming under the authority, accountability  and  discipleship of older and more mature men.  Please take several days and weeks if necessary to and read and re-read this letter as difficult as it may be.  The future legitimacy of your ministry in the wider body of Christ is at stake.   

John Stemberger
And...a year earlier, Stemberger had done what he's accusing Jivanjee of doing...the article is at this link...
http://www.tampabay.com/news/conservative-activist-john-stemberger-alleges-muslim-family-abused-runaway/1029675

    • Conservative activist John Stemberger alleges Muslim family abused runaway Christian daughter

      By Michael Kruse, Times Staff Writer
      Posted: Aug 21, 2009 11:08 AM


      ORLANDO — Prominent social conservative activist John Stemberger has made a late and dramatic entry into the already volatile case of the Ohio teen who ran away from her Muslim family saying she feared she would be killed for converting to Christianity.
      In a petition to the juvenile court which will decide later today whether Rifqa Bary, 17, should return to Ohio, Stemberger, who says he is her attorney, sought to block her reunification with her family.
      "The child is in imminent threat of harm not only from her parents but also from the extreme radical Muslim community in her hometown of Columbus," he wrote in the petition.
      It continued with allegations of her family's mental, physical and sexual abuse. Stemberger said Rifqa should be kept from her parents.
      The petition mentioned the mosque that Rifqa's parents go to and called it "the largest cell of Al Qaeda operatives" in the Columbus area. It listed the address of the Bary home in Ohio.
      Files in juvenile court cases typically are private, but Stemberger's filing became public Thursday night, showing up as a link on anti-Muslim Web sites like WorldNetDaily, The Silent Majority and Atlas Shrugs.
      Rifqa Bary went missing on July 19 from her home near Columbus, Ohio, and showed up on Aug. 10 on local TV in Orlando in the arms of an evangelical preacher.
      "This is not just some threat!" she wailed. "This is reality, this is truth, this is reality!"
      She has been in temporary foster care since then waiting for the hearing set for this afternoon. For many in the evangelical Christian community this is more than a dependency case — it's a life-and-death battle in an ongoing culture war.
      Craig McCarthy, the court-appointed attorney representing Rifqa's mother and a specialist in juvenile dependency cases, was aghast at Stemberger's petition.
      Thursday he filed a motion in response, arguing that the court should disregard Stemberger's petition and disallow his representation of Rifqa and his appearance on Friday.
      McCarthy's motion challenges Stemberger's standing as Rifqa's attorney. Stemberger, the motion said, wasn't there at the hearing on Aug. 10 when she was put in temporary foster care. She's been in undisclosed temporary foster care ever since. She is already being represented by a court-appointed guardian ad litem. How did Stemberger get appropriate access to her to enter into an attorney-client relationship? And how did she okay it? She is, after all, a minor.
      McCarthy questioned the appropriateness of publicizing the Barys' home address by allowing the motion to be linked to on the Web sites.
      "It is reasonable to believe," McCarthy wrote in his motion, "that Attorney Stemberger or his agents have encouraged and enabled the public publishing of the document …"
      "My main point is," McCarthy said on the phone with the Times around 11 p.m. Thursday night, "that he's publishing information about the family on the Web. That's the thing that really set me off. I would never do that.
      "If she gets reunited with her parents, nobody needs to know where she lives," he said, "and if she doesn't get reunited, nobody needs to know where they live."
      He said he was going to call the Florida Bar ethics hot line on Friday. Friday morning he did.
      He said he had talked to Stemberger twice earlier Thursday evening.
      The first time was to let Stemberger know that he had just filed a motion in response to his petition.
      The second time, he said, was when Stemberger said he'd take down the link to the document if McCarthy withdrew his motion.
      McCarthy said no.
      While McCarthy was on the phone to the Times a different phone rang. It was Stemberger.
      The conversation on McCarthy's end could be overheard:
      "I appreciate that," McCarthy said. "I do."
      The links to the petition from Stemberger's Web site were dead.
      McCarthy's motion, though, he said, was still a go.
      Stemberger is the president and general counsel of the Florida Family Policy Council. Orlandomagazine last month called him one of the 50 most powerful people in the city. He's a leader in Florida's anti-gay marriage movement and doesn't believe in teaching evolution "as scientific fact."
      After midnight Thursday night, Stemberger spoke with the Times.
      "I represent her," he said. "She's got a right to counsel."
      He explained that he didn't enter into a contract with a minor. He's doing this for free.
      He said he has met with Rifqa once, in person, along with the supervising guardian ad litem, but wouldn't say whether he's talked to her more by phone or other forms of electronic communication.
      As for McCarthy's motion?
      "He's going to embarrass himself," Stemberger said. "He needs to withdraw the motion or I'm going to embarrass him in court in front of a national TV audience."
      Stemberger was asked about the allegations of the abuse. Where do those come from?
      "Most of the things in this complaint," he said, "come directly from Rifqa."
      And the allegations about the mosque and "the extreme radical Muslim community" and "the Al Qaeda operatives" in Columbus?
      "It's public knowledge," Stemberger said. "You can go online and check it out."

Monday, October 18, 2010

Fallout

Thoughts of the snowy looking stuff we've all seen falling from the sky after a nuclear blast on some cheesy old movie form the 50's. It's the cleanup after a major weather event gone wrong, such as a tsunami, hurricane, tornado, flooding, or massive fire somewhere on the west coast that causes erosion of the hillsides. It can come from a shoving match on a playground between 4th graders, or from a battle in a far away desert. (the former earned me a trip to the principal's office, after the other kid wound up with a bloody nose. Hey, he started it, I finished it!) The firing of a head coach after 3 straight losses in a college football season. The loss of a political office after years of voting the wrong way on the issues. This is my friends, is what we call fallout.

So I'm watching a TV show that was recorded on the DVR and when it ended, I clicked 'save' so my wife could watch the ending later as she had left the house to get her evening exercise. As the DVR switched back the the channel that it was on before we watched the recorded show, I realized it was on one of the religious shows. I think it was the 700 Club. On screen were 3 women talking about how one of them had gotten saved through some program at a women's shelter, or something along that line. I don't know the whole story, because I changed the channel quickly. I couldn't stand to watch it because that feeling of disbelief came rising up pretty fast. I find I cannot watch that stuff anymore because I don't believe it's real. I look at Pat Robertson and can't help but wonder if he's a fake and a liar. I think he is, but I'm not 100% sure. I've read some stuff about him that said he is as fake as they come. I have nothing personal against Mr Robertson, I don't even know the man, never spent time with him. But it really doesn't mater if it's Pat Robertson, or someone else. I can't watch any TV preachers, televangelists, or the like. In fact, I'm considering blocking ANY and ALL religious channels on all TV's in my house. Is that sad or what??

Then I see one of my Facebook friends posting a video about TD Jakes and claiming how great it is. "Wooo Preach THAT Bishop Jakes" she says about the video. I have to pry myself away from it, because I used to like TD Jakes' messages on TV. I've bought & read one of his books. Yet again, I'm drawn back to what I've read about him, and how he twists scripture. And what's with the whole 'Bishop' thing? So many black preachers use that title. Bishop of what, exactly? He's not MY Bishop. I don't use the term 'Doctor' for someone who isn't MY Doctor! My daughter's Orthodontist is a friend of mine. I don't call him Doctor, I use his first name. It's not disrespect, he just doesn't need the praise of men for his validation.

Where's this bus going...I'm realizing this is the fallout of my experience with the church. Before I continue, let me set the record straight. My faith has never been stronger. I love Jesus with everything I have and everything I am. However I've never been more spiritually beat up than I have been in the past 2 and a half years. I've learned that sometimes, doing the right thing can get you the kind of fallout you don't want.

For example, if a corporation has an employee who knowingly gets involved in something unethical and illegal, then goes against what their head or authority tells them not to do in order to distance and protect the employee and the corporation from the situation, it's the corporation's responsibility to deal with that employee, no matter the position of that employee, whether president, CEO, janitor, cube warrior, or middle manager. That employee needs to be scripturally approached, disciplined, and if the behavior continues, fired.

Such is the case of the Lorenz's, who were involved in bringing Rifqa Bary down to Florida form Ohio. After being confronted, then fired for continuing in their activities that were certainly illegal, their response was to blow up and yell, instead of accepting responsibility, admitting fault, then repenting. The corporation reluctantly dealt with them in the only way it could have, given the circumstances, by 'relieving them of their responsibilities'.

The worst part was not having a pastor yell at us and say 'you're the most evil people we've ever known....you're demonic....idiots...you have no idea what you're doing..etc'. Although that's not fun. The fallout from this experience, the spiritual abuse, is this. I'm now repulsed by what I hear from the pulpits of the TV preachers, etc, when comparing it to what I'm learning from reading and studying scripture on my own. I know we're supposed to weigh things against scripture to see if they're from God or not, but this feeling of disbelief is somewhat uncomfortable, and I now have absolutely no trust in anyone using the title of Pastor.

I guess using the words 'absolutely no trust in anyone using the title of Pastor' may be a bit extreme. I have met one Pastor who has been a great friend and God has used him in leading me toward the first steps of healing from these experiences. And God has now brought my family & I to the next phase of the healing process, through another church...another pastor....who seems genuine. I can't judge him until I see the fruits of his life. For that, I must give him time and prayer.....that I would be courageous to do the right thing again, regardless of the fallout.

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Isn't this interesting?

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/crime/os-man-arrested-missing-girl-20101016,0,2404237.story

Ocoee girl who went missing, man arrested


This is an interesting situation. You have a MINOR who goes missing, her parents don't know where she is, and when the cops locate her, they arrest the guy she's with, calling it "Interference with custody". Maybe this only applies to homeless hispanic men?

(As a side note, if my kid ever went missing, whoever took her oughta be hoping the police find him before I do!)

Thursday, October 14, 2010

The gift that keeps on giving

Just when you thought it was over & done, there's this:

Rifqa Bary fallout: Blogger, Orlando lawyer fight $10M defamation lawsuit


http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-runaway-convert-lawsuit-20101012,0,2682560.story

Which came after this:
Stemberger in a fight with the Florida Bar


Which came after this:

Rifqa Bary's former lawyer in trouble with The Florida Bar


http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-rifqa-stemberger-complaint-20100923,0,5006064.story

(I don't know how to make fancy links yet, so bear with me.)

I'm no lawyer, but it sounds like Omar Tarazi has an open & shut case. These people can't hide behind the first amendment, or 'legal privilege'...I had to laugh at that one...or 'hyperbole'. They can't point the finger at someone else & say "statements of facts....  "are accurate reports of statements of others or they are true statements simply,", or  "were made in good faith and upon information and belief that the statements made were true."....and expect intelligent people to believe it.


Nope, we're not buying any of it, and I doubt the court will either. If you're gonna say something about somebody that may not be true, it's YOUR responsibility to fact check what you're saying, or risk a lawsuit for defamation. 


Pay your money, take your chances. Geller & Stemberger are all big & brave when defaming someone from behind a keyboard, but when they're called out for it, they back-peddle, and lay blame on someone else. How pathetic. They sound like liberal democrats. They sound like Rifqa's abductors.

Monday, October 4, 2010

The evil Main Stream Media

We've all heard of the Main Stream Media, right? Why do we call it 'Main Stream'? Is there a not-so-main stream? An alternate stream, perhaps. Or maybe an altogether different 'stream'...Where am I going with this?

The MSM is looked at as liberal, lying, against anything conservative, and showing a hatred of anything Christian. Let's face it, the MSM takes any opportunity it can to make a Christian, or Republican, or  anyone 'good' look...well...bad (some don't need the help!). Unless of course we're talking about Foxnews. Now there's the one news source who looks out for the good guys, correct? In my opinion, they're just as liberal as any other news source, they just sugar-coat it and call it 'fair & balanced'. We're supposed to believe that. Right.

So , the general consensus is that the MSM is the bad guy. That is until they run a story that we agree with. Now all of a sudden, we think they're true & correct. We even post the links to their 'true' story on our Facebook page, and sit back & wait for the agreeing comments to roll in. And when someone comments who disagrees with our new friend, we get all hacked off about it.

All my life I've been told the Orlando Sentinel is just as liberal as they come. However, I have to say that the reporting on the Rifqa Bary story by Rene' Stutzman has been not only truthful, but also about 90% accurate. There's really only been a few minor details that were not exactly correct. It wasn't due to Rene' trying to twist the facts to effect the outcome, or plant something untrue in the mind of the reader. Simple things like saying Parker was the president of the corporation of Global Revolution Church, when it was actually John Law who was the president at the time of the Rifqa Bary situation. (Parker became president of the corporation only after Law was voted out by the other board members.) The detail of who was president was a minor detail, and had no bearing on the course or outcome of the story.

Another detail she wrote, stated that the board members were 'too busy to answer questions' on the story. They weren't too busy, they were ordered by their lawyers to remain quiet, and speak to no media. Their lawyers told them to refer all questions to their lawyers. So, again, no twisting of the facts, just a minor detail that wasn't accurate; however true, they couldn't speak to the media. These are not Rene's fault, there's a lot of details to this story that are very confusing for even the most discerning minds. Rene' did a great job of reporting the truth.

So, If you come across something in one of the articles about the Rifqa Bary case that just doesn't sit right, come here & ask me. Be sure to provide a link to the article you're asking about.

If you're asking yourself why a church board would have to have lawyers, stick around...

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Get it right will ya?

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-rifqa-pastors-file-complaint-20100126,0,1803940.story

Inconsistencies is an understatement! Isn't it a crime to file a false police report?


Truth - Lorenz did file a complaint
Lie - Wrong date


The meeting recording that showed up in the media was recorded on September 3, 2009. In addition to Blake & Beverly Lorenz, John Law, Tom Sanchez and Jeff Parker were present at the meeting. Brian Smith was out of the country. The complaint said Brian Smith was at the meeting. There were no other people present at this meeting.



Truth - The 2 meetings were recorded on a digital audio recorder.
Lieone-time church president John Law saw Parker put a "video tape recorder" on a table before the first meeting.




If there was a video recording, why did only the audio show up in the media? They can't tell an audio recorder from a video camera? There was no video recorder, only an audio recorder.




Truth - from Parker's statement..."As I began to set up the recorder, Beverly said there was no need to record the meeting, since it was not official. I replied that the meeting was absolutely official and would be recorded.".
Liethe couple didn't know they had been taped.




She asked this before the start of the second meeting, knowing how volatile she got at the first meeting. She was pretty worried about being recorded. Understandably after what the Lorenz's said and how they acted during these meetings!




Truth - the Lorenzes called Law and asked him to contact Parker to see if the meeting was recorded. Law spoke with Parker and was told the meeting was recorded.
Liebut the tape was of poor quality and "it had been destroyed".




John asked if the meeting was recorded. When it was confirmed the meeting was recorded, he then said Lorenz asked if the parts about Rifqa could be edited out. He was NEVER told the recording was of poor quality and had been destroyed. Obviously it wasn't destroyed, because it made it into the media - Duh! He was told the meting was recorded for record keeping purposes, and nothing would be edited. The Corporation bylaws allow for meetings to be recorded. John Law was removed from the corporation on September 5 (2 days after the meeting) for his complicity in the actions of the Lorenz's and for not being truthful with Parker and Sanchez. 

Saturday, October 2, 2010

Whole lotta coachin goin on

And the puppet show starts...

http://www.10tv.com/live/content/local/stories/2009/08/11/story_teen.html?sid=102

"Bary said she hitchhiked and then rode a bus from Ohio to Florida to escape her family, Connelly reported"


She didn't hitchhike anywhere. Lorenz paid a guy (Brian Williams) in Ohio to pick her up, and take her to the bus station, where a ticket was waiting for her under a false name, purchased by John Law, former President of the Board of Directors of Global Revolution Church. All this was done without her parents' knowledge. That's called interfering with parental custody - a crime. John Law was removed from the board for doing this as well as lying to the other board members about this issue. 


"An attorney representing the girl's mother said the parents were allowing Bary to explore her Christianity. The parents claimed that their daughter was not afraid until she made contact with Pastor Blake Lorenz in Orlando."


So, she didn't fear her parents...wasn't scared until she met  up with the good pastor. Hmm...Somethin ain't quite right. Why would a pastor instill fear in her about her parents? Eyewitness accounts from the former church administrator at GRC claim Lorenz's wife coached Rifqa in what to say and what not to say to Police. What else did they coach her into saying?

Where it all began

This is where the media picks up the story. Her poor parents hadn't heard from her in 2 weeks!

http://www.10tv.com/live/content/local/stories/2009/07/31/story_teenager.html

Notice the date, July 19, 2009.

Notice they don't suspect foul play, but that she could still be in danger. Little did they know of the brain washing she'd get when she got to Florida. They did nothing but steer her away from the parents and even her little bother that she loved. I know she loved them because 2 weeks before she turned 18, she sent them a 'care package' with a video telling them she loved them, and missed them. Does that sound like a person who doesn't love or want to have anything to do with her family? Hardly. The Bary's can thank the Lorenz's for that.

Notice the Columbus Police said  "If anybody is harboring her they are definitely in violation of at least one misdemeanor charge that I know of, and that's interference of custody".


I'm sure you noticed....

What?

http://www.wftv.com/video/22307419/index.html

Ya can't make this stuff up! This is classic!

How does lying to anyone mean you have integrity? Lorenz didn't lie to protect anyone but himself. He equated his lies to the time during World War 2, when the Nazi's would go door to door, looking for Jews, and whomever answered the door would lie and say "There's no Jews here" while hiding Jews in a secret room. In Lorenz's mind, this made it OK for him to lie also. Even though in this video he says he didn't lie to the 'authorities', he only lied..oh excuse me..'changed the story'...to the media, yet it's the media he's talking to...huh? And the reporter didn't even question that statement! He should've asked, 'How do I know you're not lying to me now?'.

The ones Lorenz lied to were his covering, the board of directors of his church. The ones who were in place to oversee the day to day operations of running a church. The board was also in place to keep him accountable. At Loren's previous church, Pinecastle United Methodist, these people were even told that there had been death threats because of what & how he preached. The board members also understood they were there to protect the Lorenz's with their lives, if needed. At least 2 of them were licensed to carry concealed weapons, and did so regularly (Florida law allows it). Fortunately, there was never an issue with anyone threatening Lorenz's security. Maybe the death threat story was just that, a story.

So, when confronted with actual evidence that he'd broken the law - board members had an e-mail from Lorenz's lawyer spelling out the actual crimes committed, the Florida statutes and penalties for said crimes...corporate e-mail belongs to the corporation, it's not personal e-mail, as Lorenz's wife believed - Lorenz still adamantly denied any crimes had been committed, and kept saying his lawyers told him so.

Lying again, and being caught in the lies, is what got Lorenz so upset. And he blames the board members of stabbing them (Lorenz and his wife) in the back. Wow. So much for respecting authority. During the meeting where they were fired, Lorenz's wife actually said "You have no business being the boss of white collar workers", simply because she has a college degree, and they don't. You can also hear her asking "what about the money? That's OUR money!"....after they were fired.

Wow again.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

Christianity & Islam

With all the talk about how people are to be put to death for leaving Islam, I thought it would be fun to bring this scripture to light. I would imagine not too many Christians know about it, or would want to make it known to the world. This one is found in 2 Chronicles 15, and takes place during the reign of Asa, King of Judah. Asa was a great King....for a while. Then he decided to take matters into his own hands, (sounds like a certain pastor I know) but that came some time after this particular moment in scripture. (To get an idea of who Asa was, read chapters 14-16.) Granted, this is before Jesus Christ was on the scene. Nevertheless, the King that God found favor with, made this decree. This just does to show that Islam is not the only religion with this wording in its scripture. Now, this doesn't mean that Christians today hold to this philosophy. In the same light, there are Muslims who also don't hold to the same philosophy in Islam.


12 Then they entered into a covenant to seek the LORD God of their fathers with all their heart and with all their soul; 13 and whoever would not seek the LORD God of Israel was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman. 

Friday, September 24, 2010

It Is what it is...

This  is my first attempt at creating a blog.

I'll post more as I figure out what I want to say and how I want to say it.

Mostly this will be about the truth.

Some rules....

1.) Be polite in your comments, or your comments will be deleted.

2.) NO profanity, or your comments will be deleted.

3.) Don't advertise your own blog, business, or otherwise plug something unrelated to the topic, or your comments will be deleted.

4.) I reserve the right to remove anyone I want to remove. Racism is not allowed at any time.

5.) No whiners.

6.) Have fun! Laugh at yourself before you laugh at someone else.

7.) If you get offended easily, this isn't the place for you.

8.) If you don't like guns, this isn't the place for you.

9.) If you're a socialist, this isn't the place for you.

10.) Love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind.